Quellen

[1] Vgl. Dhaliwal, Harmeet Kaur; Allen, Mark; Kang, Jing; Bates, Claire & Hodge, Trevor (2015). The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial. Journal of Orthodontics, 42(2), 123-135.

[2] Vgl. Nelson, Cody; Hartling, Lisa; Campbell, Sandra & Oswald, Anna E. (2012). The effects of audience response systems on learning outcomes in health professions education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 21. Medical Teacher, 34(6), 386-405.

[3] Vgl. Hunsu, Nathaniel J.; Adesope, Olusola & Bayly, Dan James (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102-119.

[4] Vgl. Nelson, Hartling, Campbell & Oswald (2012).

[5] Vgl. Lours, Camille & Sujobert, Pierre (2018). Crossover trial of an audience response system application for smartphone in undergraduate medical students. MedEdPublish, 7(3), 77. CC BY SA 4.0.

[6] Vgl. Ebner, Martin; Haintz, Christian; Pichler, Karin & Schön, Sandra (2014). Technologiegestützte Echtzeit-Interaktion in Massenvorlesungen im Hörsaal. Entwicklung und Erprobung eines digitalen Backchannels während der Vorlesung. In Klaus Rummler (Hrsg.), Lernräume gestalten – Bildungskontexte vielfältig denken. Münster: Waxmann. 567-578. Verfügbar unter: 
https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2015/10116/pdf/Lernraeume_gestalten_2014_Ebner_ua_Technologiegestuetzte_Echtzeit_Interaktion.pdf