Quellen

[1] Dhaliwal, Harmeet Kaur, Allen, Mark, Kang, Jing, Bates, Claire, & Hodge, Trevor (2015). The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial. Journal of Orthodontics, 42(2), 123-135.

[2] Nelson, Cody, Hartling, Lisa, Campbell, Sandra & Oswald, Anna E. (2012). The effects of audience response systems on learning outcomes in health professions education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 21. Medical Teacher, 34(6), 386-405.

[3] Hunsu, Nathaniel J., Adesope, Olusola, & Bayly, Dan James (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102-119.

[4] Nelson, Hartling, Campbell & Oswald (2012).

[5] Lours, Camille, & Sujobert, Pierre (2018). Crossover trial of an audience response system application for smartphone in undergraduate medical students. MedEdPublish, 7(3), 77. CC BY-SA 4.0 Lours, Sujobert.

[6] Ebner, Martin, Haintz, Christian, Pichler, Karin, & Schön, Sandra (2014). Technologiegestützte Echtzeit-Interaktion in Massenvorlesungen im Hörsaal. Entwicklung und Erprobung eines digitalen Backchannels während der Vorlesung. In Klaus Rummler (Hrsg.), Lernräume gestalten – Bildungskontexte vielfältig denken. Münster: Waxmann. 567-578. Verfügbar unter: 
https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2015/10116/pdf/Lernraeume_gestalten_2014_Ebner_ua_Technologiegestuetzte_Echtzeit_Interaktion.pdf